USPTO serial 78862193
ALTEÑO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROTH, JASON I
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALTEÑO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Zuber
THOMAS F. ZUBER ZUBER & TAILLIEU LLP10866 WILSHIRE BLVD.SUITE 300LOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Tequila | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |