USPTO serial 78862204
COINSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3782855Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2010
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COINSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bellevue, WA
BELLEVUE, WA
Bellevue, WA
Bellevue, WA
Bellevue, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason S. Howell
Jason S. Howell PERKINS COIE LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Coin redemption services, namely, coin counting, sorting and converting services; financial services, namely, providing kiosks which convert coins into vouchers redeemable for cash and issue coupons offering discounts to shoppers; financial services, charitable fund raising services, providing automated kiosks to process coins that have been donated to civic and not-for-profit organizations; accepting and administering monetary charitable contributions provided through self-service kiosks; coin conversion, and coin sorting services; providing kiosks for coin conversion and coin sorting; self-service kiosks for coin conversion and coin sorting; providing kiosks that accept monetary charitable contributions; provision of financial services, namely, [ money order purchases in the nature of money wire transfers; financial services, namely, issuing automated teller machine (ATM) cards, ] gift cards, [ debit cards, other non-credit cards redeemable for goods and services, ] stored value cards, [ cash cards, prepaid long distance cards, prepaid wireless cards, and prepaid Internet cards; ] interactive gift card services, namely, providing a service which provides consumers with information about third parties' gift cards, allows consumers to purchase third parties' gift cards, and allows consumers to reload gift card balances; banking services, namely, providing automated kiosks in banks for processing coins redeemable for cash [ and issuing cash cards; check cashing services; money order purchases; and money wire transfers; payroll card services, namely, bill payment services and payroll payment services, checking and savings account balance services, ] voucher services, namely, issuing vouchers for others redeemable for discounts on goods; financial services, namely, redeeming vouchers for cash [ ; financial services, namely, accepting deposits to financial accounts from coin from kiosks; financial services, namely, bill payment services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COINSTAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OUTERWALL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Coinstar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Coinstar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Coinstar, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named COINSTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |