USPTO serial 78863974
PEMH STORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3868775Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2010
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEMH STORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLICHY, FR
North Vancouver, CA
LEICESTERSHIRE LE11 3GB, GB
North Vancouver, CA
North Vancouver, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Chadwick
Cheryl L. Chadwick BIC CorporationOne BIC WaySuite 1Shelton, CT 06484Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FUEL CELL STORAGE SYSTEM FOR FUEL CELLS COMPRISED OF FUEL CELL FUEL CONTAINERS, FUEL CELL FUEL TUBING; FUEL CELLS; FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS OF FUEL CELLS, NAMELY, FUEL CELL STACKS, FUEL CELL PROCESSORS, FUEL CELL REFORMERS, FUEL CELL POWER CONTROLLERS, FUEL CELL POWER CONVERTERS, FUEL CELL CONDITIONERS, AND FUEL CELL MEMBRANE ASSEMBLIES THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 8, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE BIC
- Other trademarks owned by Angstrom Power Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT ENERGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Angstrom Power Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Angstrom Power Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PEMH STORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |