Drawing for POOP-PEE

USPTO serial 78864012

POOP-PEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POOP-PEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy J. Benjamin, Abigail Rubinstein, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Eric Prager, Karin Segall, Randi S. Miller, Heather C. Wilde, Laura J. Winston, Jonathan Matkowsky and Kathryn Starnella

Amy J. Benjamin, Abigail Rubinstein, Andrew Baum, DARBY & DARBY P.C.P.O. Box 770, Church Street StationNEW YORK, NY 10008-0770UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Disposable housebreaking pads for petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance