Drawing for RIPTIDE LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78864222

RIPTIDE LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIPTIDE LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Seldon

ROBERT SELDON Seldon & Scillieri10940 Wilshire Blvd.18th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90024-3952

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services relating to managing supply chain services, reverse logistics, managing logistics, supply chain visibility and synchronization, supply and demand forecasting and product distribution processing for others; product distribution business management services; merchandise packaging services, namely, product bundling, repackaging, kitting of packages, labeling of packages, order fulfillment, return processing, namely management of returned merchandise; processing of repair orders for others; Logistic, reverse logistics and supply services, namely, computerized processing, tracking and monitoring of shipment of finished goods, raw materials, packages and other freight for others; Business consulting services relating to logistics, reverse logistics, product distribution, operation management, supply chain, manufacturing and distribution solution and RFID (radio frequency identification) solutions; Business information management services, namely, order entry services, order processing services and invoicing services; Shipment management, namely inbound and outbound scheduling of shipment for users of transportation services, preparation of shipping documents, and tracking of documents, packages and freight shipments via electronic data interchange, intranet and internet; Customer warranty relationship management, namely processing warranty registration documents for others; operation of telephone call center for others, namely technical call processing and repair parts order fulfillment servicesACTIVE—
037Refurbishment of electronic products for others, namely, monitors, televisions, personal computers, notebook computers, digital cameras, and computer printersACTIVE—
039Manufacturing logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, warehousing; shipping and delivery services, namely pick-up, transportation and delivery of finished goods, raw materials, packages and freight for others by truck, rail, air and shipACTIVE—
040Re-manufacturing for others, namely contract manufacturing in the field of electronics; sub-assembly of products for othersACTIVE—
042Providing quality assurance services in the field of electronics; information technology support for order management, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance