USPTO serial 78864315
MY LIFE IS A MUSIC VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY LIFE IS A MUSIC VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tujunga, CA
Tujunga, CA
Tujunga, CA
Sunland, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Cable television programming; Charitable services, namely, providing televisions to those in need; Direction of making radio or television programs; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Distribution of television programs for others; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of music videos, documentaries, live musical performances, with audience voting for best music video performances; entertainment in the nature of a one-hour tv program series featuring music videos, documentaries, live musical performances, with audience voting for best music video performances; entertainment namely, production of music videos, documentaries, live musical performances, with audience voting for best music video performances; entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of children's entertainment; entertainment services namely live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of music videos, documentaries, live musical performances, with audience voting for best music video performances via a global computer network; entertainment, namely a continuing music videos, documentaries, live musical performances, with audience voting for best music video performances show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Operation of video equipment or audio equipment etc; for production of radio or television programs; Production of cable television programs; Production of closed caption television programs; Production of radio and television programs; Production of radio or television programs; Providing ratings for television, movie, music, video and video game content; Rental of radios and televisions; Rental of television sets; Television and radio programming; Television production; Television program syndication; Television programming; Television scheduling; Television show production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sariego, Christopher A.
- Other trademarks owned by Revord, Sherry A.
- Other trademarks owned by Sariego, Christopher A.
- Other trademarks owned by Revord, Sherry A.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MY LIFE IS A MUSIC VIDEO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |