Drawing for LUSCIOUS LOTION

USPTO serial 78864618

LUSCIOUS LOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUSCIOUS LOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah M. Lodge

DEBORAH M LODGE PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Beauty products, namely, body, hand, facial and foot lotionsACTIVEApr 6, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 4, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 3, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2012LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 12, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 11, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 10, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 9, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 4, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance