Drawing for CO-INQUIRY

USPTO serial 78864881

CO-INQUIRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CO-INQUIRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Arranging professional workshop and training courses; Computer education training; Computer education training services; Conducting educational exhibitions in the field of education; Education services, namely, providing seminars, workshops in the field of education; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Educational services namely conducting programs in the field of education; Educational services, namely, conducting on-line exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the field of education; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, conferences, workshops in the field of education; Information about education; Information on education; Publication of documents in the field of training, science, public law and social affairs; Training in the use and operation of computers, digital cameras, video cameras; Training in the use of computers, digital cameras, video cameras; Training services in the field of education; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring methods for improving teaching and learningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance