USPTO serial 78865116
PIPELINE POSSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIPELINE POSSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Clemente, CA
San Clemente, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farhad Novian
Farhad Novian Novian & Novian LLP1801 Century Park EastSuite 1201Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeglasses; sunglasses; spectacle frames, protective cases for spectacles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |