USPTO serial 78865117
PIPELINE POSSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIPELINE POSSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Clemente, CA
San Clemente, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farhad Novian
FARHAD NOVIAN NOVIAN & NOVIAN LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E SUITE 1201LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Photograph albums; appointment books; art etchings; art pictures; art prints; printed awards; memorandum boards; book covers; calendars; comic books; newspaper comic strips; decals; erasers; Books in the field of surfing; pencils; pens; personal day planners; mounted photographs; unmounted photographs; posters; stickers; temporary tattoos; paper trading cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fletcher, Dibi
- Other trademarks owned by Fletcher, Dibi
- Other trademarks owned by SONGER, RICK
- Other trademarks owned by SEW CAL LOGO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PIPELINE POSSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |