USPTO serial 78865163
BENTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laguna Niguel, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew V. Leitch
ANDREW V LEITCH SONGSTAD & RANDALL LLP2201 DUPONT DR STE 100IRVINE, CA 92612-7511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded records, audio cassettes, compact discs, digital video discs (DVDs), CD-ROMS,laser discs, and video discs, sound and visual recordings and downloadable sound and video recordings, all featuring music, musical performances, dance performances and dramatic works;motion picture films about performing artists; motion picture films featuring animation;multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring music, music-based entertainment, and dramatic works; downloadable motion pictures about performing artists and downloadable graphics in the nature of pictures all downloadable via a computer network; and downloadable music via a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of record label services, namely, audio recording and production, music video production services, and music publishing services; live performances by a musical artist, musical band and musical group; entertainment in the nature of live visual and audio performances by a musical artist, musical band and musical group; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; entertainment, namely, personal appearances by a musical artist, musical band and musical group; providing audio or video studios; publication of musical texts; radio entertainment production; record production; recording studios; sound recording studios; providing a website featuring entertainment information, namely reviews and articles pertaining to performance artists, interviews, music videos, music charts, personal biographies, diaries, information on music instruments, tour dates, release dates, games, trivia, viewable memorabilia in the nature of photographs, video clips, and audio clips, all pertaining to performing artists all available via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |