Drawing for TIKI GAMES

USPTO serial 78865264

TIKI GAMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIKI GAMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

Beth M. Goldman Heller Ehrman LLP333 Bush StreetSan Francisco, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software and electronic games, namely, computer game software recorded on CD-ROMs, DVDs, cartridges and discs for computers; computer game software and electronic games recorded on CD-ROMs, DVDs, cartridges and discs for console and portable gaming systems; computer game software that is downloadable from a remote computer site; computer game software for mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and handheld computers recorded on computer media; downloadable computer game software for mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and handheld computers; user guides sold as a unit with all of the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely providing online multi-player computer gamesACTIVE—
042Development of computer game software and electronic games for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance