USPTO serial 78865454
CONSTRUCTION LOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3365756Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSTRUCTION LOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Crimi Speth
Maria Crimi Speth Jaburg & Wilk, P.C.3200 N. Central Ave.Suite 2000Phoenix, AZ 85012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
- Other trademarks owned by Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
- Other trademarks owned by Werner Way, Inc., d/b/a/ Construction Lots
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CONSTRUCTION LOTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |