USPTO serial 78865935
HALO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HALO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter V. Schroeder
KIMBERLY A ECKHART WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA STREET39TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5894Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Cleaning machines, namely, disinfecting appliances utilizing ultraviolet light and disinfecting devices, namely sterilizers utilizing ultraviolet light not for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |