USPTO serial 78866397
KRMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, boy's, women's, girl's and children's clothing, namely, jumpsuits, sweatshorts, overalls, swimsuits, socks, sleepwear, loungewear, wristbands, neckwear; women's and girl's blouses, skirts, hosiery, pantyhose, tights and stockings; underwear, namely, briefs and tops, bras and panties; hats, scarves, gloves; footwear and headwear; men's clothing, namely, sweatpants; boy's clothing, namely, pants, coats; women's clothing, namely, sweaters, sweatpants; girl's clothing, namely, pants, jeans, shorts, singlets, vests, coats, jackets, dresses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ho'okipa Nominees Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Ho'okipa Nominees Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by NDLTM PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KRMA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |