Drawing for FLEXCOAT

USPTO serial 78866905

FLEXCOAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXCOAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH G. CURATOLO

MARK L WHIPKEY DEGUSSA CORPORATION379 INTERPACE PKWYPARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-1115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Elastomeric decorative coatings for use in new construction, maintenance, or restoration on above grade exterior masonry, namely stucco, brick, concrete, Concrete Masonry Unit and Exterior Insulation Finish SystemsACTIVEMar 10, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 12, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 27, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 20, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 15, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 2, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 30, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 15, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance