USPTO serial 78866917
ARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tal Grinblat
Tal Grinblat Lewitt, Hackman, Shapiro, Marshall & Harlan16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Adhesives for affixing false hair; Adhesives for false eyelashes, hair and nails; Antibacterial skin soaps; Baby hair conditioner; Beauty creams for body care; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body and beauty care preparations; Concealers for skin, face and body; Conditioners; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; Decorative transfers and skin jewels for cosmetic purposes; Deodorants for body care; Exfoliants for skin, face and body; Gel for hair; Hair balsam; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair coloring preparations; Hair conditioners; Hair conditioners for babies; Hair creams; Hair dressings for men; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gels; Hair lacquers; Hair lighteners; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair piece bonding glue; Hair pomades; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair removing cream; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair-washing powder; Hydrogen peroxide for use on the hair; Japanese hair fixing oil (bintsuke-abura); Lotions for face and body care; Lotions for hair, face and body; Mousse for hair and face; Non-medicated lip care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; Non-medicated sun care preparations; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Patches containing sun screen and sun block for use on the skin; Pomades for hair; Shampoos; Skin abrasive preparations; Skin bronzing creams; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin clarifiers; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin conditioners; Skin cream; Skin creams; Skin emollients; Skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; Skin lighteners; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin polishing rice bran (arai-nuka); Skin soap; Skin texturizers; Skin whitening preparations; Soaps for body care; Sun care lotions; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Wax strips for removing body hair; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |