USPTO serial 78867109
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CERAMTEC NORTH AMERICA INNOVATIVE CERAMIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Laurens, SC
Other trademarks owned by CERAMTEC NORTH AMERICA INNOVATIVE CERAMIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION
CERAMTEC NORTH AMERICA INNOVATIVE CERAMIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Laurens, SC
Other trademarks owned by CERAMTEC NORTH AMERICA INNOVATIVE CERAMIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION
CERAMTEC NORTH AMERICA INNOVATIVE CERAMIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Laurens, SC
Other trademarks owned by CERAMTEC NORTH AMERICA INNOVATIVE CERAMIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION
LAURENS, SC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil C. Jones
Neil C. Jones Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP301 South College Street, 23rd FloorOne Wells Fargo CenterCharlotte, NC 28202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Ceramic dipping molds for use with or accessories for forming machine; components of welding machines; and textile machine guides, and face seal rings and pump pistons made of ceramic materials, namely, for use in power electronics, thermo-electrical applications, optoelectronics, electrical conductors and sensors, electronic applications | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1985 |
| 010 | Endoprostheses for replacement of joints and bones | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1985 |
| 011 | Gas burners for household and industrial applications; and insulating components for heating equipment, namely, crushable tubes made of alumina | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1985 |
| 040 | Laser scribing of substrates, laser machining of metals, laser drilling and annealing of ceramic substrates; firing and calcining of powders and powder compacts, specifically the removal of any organic matter, water, and binder materials by the action of heat and atmosphere to change the material's chemical composition, phases or both; processing of materials, namely, alumina, magnesium aluminum silicate, zircon and titania in powder form; custom manufacture for others of ceramic and metal materials and products for use in the fields of laboratory research, telecommunications, petroleum exploration and refining, power generation and distribution, and ceramics manufacturing, namely, automotive equipment, electronic components, medical technology equipment, and appliance and machinery components | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 25, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 16, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |