USPTO serial 78867142
HO HO-HO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HO HO-HO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Flynt
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Fabric-based ribbon; paper-based gift boxes; enclosure gift cards; paper-based gift bags;tissue paper sheets; cellophane wrapping paper and stacking cardboard boxes for figurines | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2002 |
| 021 | Ceramic Santa Claus and ceramic Christmas themed baskets, mugs, cookie jars, candle holders not of precious metal, teapots not of precious metal, serving planers, planters for flowers and plants, salt and pepper shakers, and candy dishes | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2002 |
| 028 | BALLOONS AND PLUSH DOLLS | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2002 |
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF RIBBON, GIFT BOXES, ENCLOSURE CARDS, GIFT BAGS, TOTES, TISSUE SHEETS, CELLANE WRAPPING PAPER AND STACKING BOX FIGURINES, CERAMIC SANTA CLAUS AND CHRISTMAS THEMED BASKETS, MUGS, COOKIE JARS, CANDLE HOLDERS, SPREADER GIFT SETS, TEAPOTS, PLATTERS, PLANTERS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, CANDY DISHES, RIBBON, GIFT BOXES, ENCLOSURE CARDS, GIFT BAGS, TOTES, TISSUE SHEETS, CELLANE WRAPPING PAPER, AND STACKING BOX FIGURINES, BALLOONS AND PLUSH DOLLS | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flowers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HO HO-HO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |