USPTO serial 78867933
Serial No. 78867933
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78867933?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
Michael B. Lasky Michael B. Lasky220 South Sixth Street1700 US Bank Plaza SouthMinneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal spray nozzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |