Drawing for SCARY GAME

USPTO serial 78868122

SCARY GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCARY GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connie L. Ellerbach

Connie L. Ellerbach Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive entertainment software and related instruction manuals sold together as a unit, namely computer game software and manuals sold as a unit; video game software and manuals sold as a unit; computer and video game ROM cartridges, CD-ROMs, DVDs, flash memories, discs and tapes featuring games, films, music, and manuals sold as a unit; downloadable computer game and video game software, and downloadable software for playing computer games and video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance