USPTO serial 78869039
AQUANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan W. Johnson
Nathan W. Johnson Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP1819 Fifth Avenue NorthBirmingham, AL 35203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Potable drinking water infrastructure products, namely, rubber pipes and non-metal flexible pipes, valves of rubber or vulcanized fiber and pipe fittings not of metal, namely, rosettes; commercial water infrastructure products used by towns and municipalities to transport potable drinking water from water utility companies to residential, commercial and industrial users, namely, rubber pipes and non-metal flexible pipes, valves of rubber or vulcanized fiber and pipe fittings not of metal, namely, rosettes; valves of rubber or vulcanized fiber; flexible pipes, not of metal; non-metal pipe collars; non-metal pipe couplings and joints; non-metal pipe muffs for use with non-metal pipe, namely, pipe made of polyvinyl chloride ("PVC") and high density polypropylene or polyethylene ("HDPE") pipes; pipe fittings, namely, rosettes; pipe gaskets; plastic pipes for plumbing purposes; plastic conduit for plumbing use; plastic hoses for plumbing use; plastic pipes for plumbing purposes; plastic plumbing hoses; plumbing pipes of plastic; watertight rings for plumbing pipes; plastic couplings and elbows for use with electrical conduits; plastic conduit and plastic fittings therefor for use in underground and above-ground electrical installations; valve closure seating being a part of large butterfly valves not of metal; vulcanized fiber, polyvinyl chloride ("PVC"), and high density polypropylene or polyethylene ("HDPE") valves for water,filtration, power plant and industrial uses, turbine-condenser expansion joints of vulcanized fiber, polyvinyl chloride ("PVC"), and high density polypropylene or polyethylene ("HDPE"); glass fiber filtration media sold in rolls; graphite packing for pumps, gaskets and valves; non-metal pipe flanges; rubber plugs for T's and nipples; rubber seat butterfly valves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |