USPTO serial 78869685
EVIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay K. Meadway
JAY K MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST FL 51PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hardware for use in the video communication system, namely, video encoders, video decoders, telephones, mobile telephones, satellite phones, video telephones, telephone transmitters, video receivers, video cameras, video compression transmitters, video frequency machines, video recorders, video screens, computers, computer sewers, digital camcorders, televisions, television transmitters, routers, private branch exchangers, network video recorders and personal digital assistants; computer software for use in having personal computers and personal digital assistant terminals act as telephones; computer software for the encryption and decryption of video files and streams in the video communication system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |