Drawing for AVALON HEALTH

USPTO serial 78869861

AVALON HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVALON HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elliott C. Bankendorf

Elliott C. Bankendorf Partridge IP Law P.C.321 North Clark StreetSuite 720CHICAGO, IL 60654

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036ISSUING GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE POLICIES AND OFFERING AS A LICENSED INSURER SUCH HEALTH INSURANCE POLICIES AND THE ADMINISTRATION THEREOF EXCLUDING ACTING AS A BROKER OR INSURANCE AGENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 6, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 5, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 19, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance