Drawing for DARE TO DREAM

USPTO serial 78869883

DARE TO DREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DARE TO DREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC255 E FIFTH ST2800 CHEMED CTRCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software, for computer games to be played either locally on a single computer or over a local global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance