USPTO serial 78870219
CABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Inc.
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Inc.
National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Inc.
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth A. Chapman
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely promoting the interests of cable provided communications services | ABANDONED | Jan 30, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CABLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |