Drawing for WEBCHEST

USPTO serial 78870378

WEBCHEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBCHEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. Baird, Sarah A. Crain, Michael T. Olsen, Bradley J. Walz

STEPHEN R BAIRD, SARAH A CRAIN, MICHAE WINTHROP & WEINSTINE PA225 S 6TH ST STE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing on-line retail store services featuring computer software and utilities for use in the field of portable and handheld digital electronic devices, entertainment materials and content in the field of portable and handheld digital electronic devices, educational materials in the field of portable and handheld digital electronic devices; providing information on consumer products, services and related information via a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Providing links to the websites of others featuring reference materials in the field of portable and handheld digital electronic devices and information and advice for consumers; Providing a search engine for obtaining information, websites and other resources in the field of portable and handheld digital electronic devices via a global computer network; Providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance