USPTO serial 78870692
MADE IN THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MADE IN THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mexico Fed. District, MX
Mexico Fed. District, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Kirschstein, Esq.
David B. Kirschstein, Esq. Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER SOLD IN BULK, AND GOOD MADE FROM THESE MATERIALS AND NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY, CARRY-ALL BAGS, TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS, TRUNKS AND TRAVELLING BAGS; ANIMAL SKINS, ANIMAL HIDES; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS; WHIPS, HARNESS AND SADDLERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE; MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES, GOODS MADE OF WOOD, CORK, REED, CANE, WICKER, HORN, BONE, IVORY, WHALEBONE, SHELL AMBER, MOTHER-OF-PEARL, MEERSCHAUM AND PLASTIC, NAMELY, LETTER BOXES, HAMPERS, MAIL RACKS, COAT RACKS, MAGAZINE RACKS, FILING CABINETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN UTENSILS AND CONTAINERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL OR COATED THEREWITH, NAMELY, NAPKIN HOLDERS, NAPKIN RINGS, TOWEL RACKS, TRASH CANS, HOLDERS FOR TOILET PAPER, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, SOAP DISHES AND SOAP DISPENSERS; GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE, NAMELY, BEVERAGE GLASSES, BOWLS, PLATES, CUPS, SAUCERS, SERVING DISHES, SERVING TRAYS, SOUP TUREENS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, SUGAR AND CREAM SETS, TEAPOTS, COFFEE SERVERS, CANISTER SETS, CANDLE HOLDERS AND VASES; CLEANING SPONGES; HAIR COMBS; BRUSHES, NAMELY, HAIR BRUSHES, NAIL BRUSHES, SCRUBBING BRUSHES, DISH WASHING BRUSHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TEXTILE PLACEMATS, TOWELS, WASH CLOTHS, PILLOWCASES, BED SHEETS, QUILTS, BED BLANKETS AND CURTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, ROBES; FOOTWEAR AND HEAD WEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | CARPETS, RUGS, MATS AND MATTING, LINOLEUM FOR COVERING EXISTING FLOORS NON-TEXTILE WALL HANGINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Poire Torres, Luis
- Other trademarks owned by Poire Torres, Luis
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named MADE IN THE WORLD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |