USPTO serial 78870889
WII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3927761Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2011
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PL1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Game services, namely, providing online computer games and video games for a wide audience via hand-held video game apparatus with liquid crystal display, and arcade-type video game machines; providing non-downloadable video game programs for use with computers, video game machines, and hand-held video game machines with a liquid crystal display that may be accessed network-wide by network users via wireless communication; amusement, namely, amusement centers; providing entertainment services, namely, providing entertainment in the nature of non-downloadable sounds and images in the field of musical videos, that may be accessed by network users via arcade game machines; rental of video game software; rental of hand-held electronic video game software; digital imaging services; arranging conferences, seminars and exhibitions; training services in the field of computer/electronic/video games; organizing exhibitions for educational or cultural purposes; publication of books; publication of electronic books and on-line magazines; publication of texts except advertising texts; movie production; presentation of live show performances; television show production; radio and television programs production; television entertainment in the nature of television programs in the field of computer/electronic/video games; recording studios services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |