USPTO serial 78871788
LAWN GENIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2008
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LAWN GENIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Byrne
Linda M. Byrne The Toro Company8111 Lyndale Avenue SouthBloomington, MN 55420-1196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Irrigation [ timers both electronic and electro-mechanical; ] replacement parts for solenoid valves [ and timers ] | ACTIVE | May 21, 1965 |
| 011 | [ Drip irrigation kits consisting primarily of tubing, emitters, tees, stakes, and swivels; ] water valves being parts of sprinkler systems, either manual or electric, with and without anti-siphon capability; replacement parts for valves being parts of sprinkler systems | ACTIVE | May 21, 1965 |
| 021 | [ Lawn, grass and shrub sprinklers, namely, spray heads and rotors ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 1965 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Toro Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Toro Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Toro Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named LAWN GENIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |