USPTO serial 78872118
CLARITY PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLARITY PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Kelber
MICHAEL G KELBER NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 N LASALLE ST REET, STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management consulting services, namely, aligning business processes, people and information with enterprise strategy | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 2005 |
| 042 | Information technology consulting services; computer software development and implementation services; computer software design and implementation for wireless communications devices; enterprise software configuration and implementation; providing technology infrastructure services, namely, network design, implementation and administration; computer and computer security services, namely, restricting access to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities, remote and on-site management of electronic messaging systems and applications for others, technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems including desktop computers and network servers and computer system administration for others | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |