USPTO serial 78873339
SUNMOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3801239Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2010
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNMOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, KR
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, KR
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PCP.O. Box 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SOYA FLOUR FOR FOOD; SOYA SAUCE; GOCHU-JANG, NAMELY, FERMENTED HOT PEPPER PASTE; DOYN-JANG, NAMELY, FERMENTED SOYBEAN PASTE; JA-JANG, NAMELY, BLACK PASTE FOR NOODLE SAUCE; CHONGGUG-JANG, NAMELY, FERMENTED SOYBEAN PASTE; CHUN-JANG, NAMELY, CHINESE SOYBEAN PASTE; CHINESE MATRIMONY VINE TEA; GREEN TEA; BARLEY LEAVES TEA; BARLEY TEA; SWEET FLAG TEA; ACANTHOPANAX TEA; OOLONG TEA CHINESE TEA; STAMINA ENHANCING TEA; GINSENG TEA; TEA LEAVES; BLACK TEA ENGLISH TEA; COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; COFFEE BEVERAGES WITH MILK; COCOA BEVERAGES WITH MILK; CHOCOLATE-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY-BASED OR VEGETABLE BASED; COFFEE; COFFEE-BASED BEVERAGES; COCOA; COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2009 |
| 032 | VEGETABLE JUICES BEVERAGES; NON-ALCOHOLIC RICE NECTAR BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF A SOFT DRINK; FRUIT SYRUPS AND FRUIT EXTRACTS FOR MAKING AND BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS AND FRUIT DRINKS; PEANUT MILK-BASED SOFT DRINK; LEMONADES; SYRUPS FOR LEMONADE; MANDARIN ORANGE JUICE BEVERAGES; POWDERS FOR EFFERVESCING BEVERAGES; PASTILLES FOR EFFERVESCING BEVERAGES; FRUIT NECTARS NON-ALCOHOLIC; APERITIFS, NON-ALCOHOLIC; NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES; APPLE JUICE BEVERAGES; SODA POP; SELTZER WATER; SODA WATER; ORGEAT; MILK OF ALMONDS BEVERAGE; ISOTONIC BEVERAGES; ORANGE JUICE BEVERAGE; WHEY BEVERAGES; SARSAPARILLA SOFT DRINK; SHERBET-BASED BEVERAGES; POWDERED GINSENG USED AS A FLAVORING; GINSENG EXTRACTS FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF GINSENG JUICES; GINSENG JUICE-BASED BEVERAGES; GINGER ALE; COFFEE SYRUP; COLA SYRUP; AERATED WATER; TOMATO JUICE-BASED BEVERAGES; PINEAPPLE JUICE-BASED BEVERAGES; MUST; GRAPE JUICE BEVERAGES; MINERAL WATER BEVERAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Chung's Food Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Chung's Food Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Chung's Food Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SUNMOND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |