USPTO serial 78873925
VIRTUALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays for use in video monitors, TV monitors, computer monitors, head mounted video displays, wearable video displays, video projectors and cell phones; projection screens; video projection displays; video monitors and computer monitors for computer games; TV monitors; computer monitors; transparent liquid crystal displays; transparent polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays; computer hardware and software for use therewith in tracking eye movement; video displays for displaying data using a substantially downward line of sight; transparent liquid crystal displays for overlaying visual data on an external scene; transparent polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays for overlaying visual data on an external scene; symbology displays, namely, liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays for displaying symbolic data; diffractive displays, namely, liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays based on diffiactive optical principles; three dimensional displays, namely, displays for projecting three dimensional volumetric images; stereoscopic displays; auto-stereoscopic displays, namely, screens for used in providing left and right eye perspective images; spatial light modulators; laser displays, namely, liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays using lasers as illumination sources; liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays using light emitting diode bulbs as illumination sources; edge-lit displays, namely, liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays in which illumination is admitted via the edge of the display; eye-tracked displays, namely, liquid crystal displays and polymer dispersed liquid crystal displays in which the displayed data is determined by the direction of gaze of an observer viewing the display; holograms recorded in polymer dispersed liquid crystals; holograms recorded in polymer dispersed liquid crystals for shaping and transmitting light in a variety of applications; electrically switchable holograms recorded in polymer dispersed liquid crystals; holograms recorded in polymer dispersed liquid crystals and illuminated via the edge of the hologram; electrically switchable holograms recorded in polymer dispersed liquid crystals and illuminated via the edge of the hologram; holographic optical lenses; holographic optical mirrors for scientific and technical purposes; holographic optical phase modulators; optical lenses; optical mirrors for scientific and technical purposes; diffractive optical lenses; diffractive optical mirrors for scientific and technical purposes; laser scanners; phase modulators, optical lenses and optical mirrors for reducing speckle in laser displays; projection screens for reducing speckle in laser displays; electrically switchable holograms recorded in polymer dispersed liquid crystals for reducing speckle in laser displays; optical filters; holographic optical filters; dichroic optical filters; optical polarizers; phase modulators; phase retarders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |