USPTO serial 78874366
WORDSENSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORDSENSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newbury, Berkshire, GB
Newbury, Berkshire, GB
Newbury, Berkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Pieroni
Lisa A. Pieroni Kirschstein, Israel, Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.425 Fifth Avenue5th FloorNew York, NY 10016-2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ computer operating programs; ] computer software, namely, document analysis, document comparison and reporting total software; [ blank CD ROMs for sound or video recordings; blank recordable DVDs; ] pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser discs and DVDs featuring advice and information regarding document analysis, document comparison and reporting tool software; [ disc memories; peripheral memory products, namely, solid state memories; solid state memories in the form of cards or solid state drives; hard discs for computers; ] optical discs featuring document analysis, document comparison and reporting total software; [ blank magnetic discs; blank magneto-optical discs; blank magnetic tapes; semi-conductor memories;] computer software for use in document management, document comparison, document analysis, document merging, document matching, document categorization, document consolidation, computer software in the field of consultancy and advisory services [ ; computer software in the field of design ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming, [ leasing of computers, ] rental of computers, computer systems and computer software; computer services, namely, providing advisory and consultancy services relating to computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |