USPTO serial 78875401
MACROLANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MACROLANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHAM, CH
LAUSANNE, CH
UPPSALA, SE
UPPSALA, SE
UPPSALA, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Atkins
Elizabeth Atkins LATHROP & GAGE L.C.230 PARK AVE RM 1847NEW YORK, NY 10169-1304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aesthetic and cosmetic preparations, namely, pre-filled injection syringes containing a non-medicated hyaluronic acid-based gel, sold as a kit, for filling out wrinkles, folds, scars, lips as well as for face and body contouring and for rejuvenation of the skin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Injection syringes sold pre-filled with a medicated gel, sold as a kit, for filling out wrinkles, folds, scars, lips as well as for face and body contouring and for rejuvenation of the skin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Implants consisting of artificial gel sold alone or in kits with pre-filled syringes for filling out wrinkles, folds, scars and lips, for face and body contouring and for rejuvenation of the skin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical clinics; health care, pharmaceutical advice; beauty salons; medical assistance services; plastic surgery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GALDERMA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by NESTLÉ SKIN HEALTH S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Q-MED AB
- Other trademarks owned by Q-MED AB
- Other trademarks owned by Q-MED AB
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MACROLANE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |