USPTO serial 78876240
MICROSPAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROSPAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PLANO, TX
PLANO, TX
PLANO, TX
Plano, TX
Plano, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
K. Bradford Adolphson
K BRADFORD ADOLPHSON WARE, FRESSOLA, VAN DER SLUYS & ADOLPHSOPO BOX 224MONROE, CT 06468-0224UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructure and communications protocols | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL-LUCENT HOLDINGS INC
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL-LUCENT HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALCATEL-LUCENT HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Alcatel USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alcatel USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MICROSPAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |