USPTO serial 78876284
BILTMORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2011
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BILTMORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ASHEVILLE, NC
Asheville, NC
Asheville, NC
Asheville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Biller
Anthony J. Biller Envisage Law2601 Oberlin Rd.Raleigh, NC 27608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Liquid and skin soaps; [perfumes;] cosmetics, lotions, namely, hand and body lotions | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2011 |
| 019 | [ Balustrades; Fireplace mantels; Fireplace surrounds; Millwork, exclusive of cabinets; Non-metal decorative moldings and decorative trim for use in building construction; Non-metal doors; Non-metal garage doors; and flooring, namely, hardwood flooring ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2011 |
| 027 | carpets and rugs, area rugs, non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BILTMORE COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Biltmore Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Biltmore Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Biltmore Company
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named BILTMORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |