Drawing for FOODVAC

USPTO serial 78876624

FOODVAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOODVAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley P. Heisler

Bradley P. Heisler HEISLER & ASSOCIATES3017 DOUGLAS BLVD STE 300ROSEVILLE, CA 95661-3850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Food and beverage storage and preservation containers for home use which incorporate a pump for removal of air for the purpose of maintaining freshnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance