Drawing for EARPRINT

USPTO serial 78876814

EARPRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARPRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hollis Beth Hire

Hollis Beth Hire WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer hardware, namely, integrated circuits and circuit boards, computer peripherals, personal digital assistants; communications hardware and telecommunications hardware, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, radio telephones, mobile telephones, voice over Internet protocol (voip) telephones, telephone answering machines, intercoms, headsets and earphones for use with telephones, pagers, telecommunications and communications switches; consumer electronic devices, namely, audio tape players, audio tape recorders, digital audio players, mp3 players, audio receivers, stereo receivers, compact disc players, video recorders, video players, video tape players, video tape recorders, digital video players, dvd players, digital video recorders, video receivers, video cameras, loudspeakers, headphones, earphones, television sets, video monitors, video recorders, radios, radios incorporating clocks, two-way radios, transceivers, megaphones; electronic devices for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content, namely, loudspeakers, sound enhancers, headphones, earphones, microphones; computer software for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content; computer software for the administration and interpretation of hearing tests, and for storing hearing test resultsACTIVE—
010Hearing aids; medical devices for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content, namely, sound enhancers, stethoscopes, assistive listening devices, headphones and earphones, microphones, loudspeakers; medical devices for testing hearing, namely, audiometers, headsets and earphones, loudspeakers, automated audiometersACTIVE—
042Testing for and development of psycho-acoustic and hearing profiles; testing for and development of psycho-acoustic and hearing profiles by means of electronic communications networks, telephone, and wireless communications media; database development services, namely, compiling and creating databases of hearing test results, hearing profiles, and psycho-acoustic profiles; customization for others of the audio output and audio characteristics of computer hardware, communications and telecommunications hardware, and consumer electronics devices for others, such services rendered in person, by wireless, wired or optical communications networks, or by encoding smart cards or optical or magnetic data storage mediaACTIVE—
044Medical services, namely, administration of hearing tests; administration of hearing tests by means of electronic communications networks, telephone, and wireless communications mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 5, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance