Drawing for AQUAMAN

USPTO serial 78877522

AQUAMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUAMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Kobrin

JANET A KOBRIN WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT INCBRIDGE BLDG 156 N #50784000 WARNER BLVDBURBANK, CA 91522

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated television series; production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated television series; distribution and display of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture theatrical films; production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture theatrical films; theatrical performances both animated and live action; Internet services providing information via an electronic global computer network in the field of entertainment relating specifically to movies, and television; providing news about current events and entertainment, and information related to education and cultural events, via a global computer network; and providing information for and actual entertainment via an electronic global communications network in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated programs and production of live-action comedy, action and animated motion films for distribution via a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 13, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 5, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 5, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 12, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 12, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 12, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance