Drawing for KOOL COW SPARKLING DRINK MOO

USPTO serial 78878128

KOOL COW SPARKLING DRINK MOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOOL COW SPARKLING DRINK MOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa K. Shebar

110 N. Gables Blvd.Wheaton, IL 60187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beveragesABANDONEDAug 7, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 4, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 12, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance