USPTO serial 78878301
NO SO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO SO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
MICOL CECCHI ADAMS & REESE LLP424 CHURCH ST STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219-2386UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Safety clothes, namely, water ski safety vests, bullet-proof vests and clothing; protective suits, namely, diving suits, survival suits; protective suits for aviators, namely, survival suits; protective clothing; protective hats, namely, hard hats; protective boots, namely, protective industrial boots | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Rucksacks; camping bags, namely, backpacks for camping, hiking bags for camping; beach and travel bags; bags, namely, backpacks, duffel bags, athletic bags; shopping bags, namely, leather shopping bags, mesh shopping bags, shopping bags with wheels attached; handbags; backpacks; traveling bags; wallets; purses; briefcases; document holders, namely, carrying cases for documents; gent's handbags; trunks; animal skins and hides; leatherware, namely, briefcases, traveling bags; leather goods made of leather, namely, handbags, key cases, shopping bags; leather and imitation leather; goods made of leather and imitation leather, namely, briefcases, leather and imitation leather bags, leather for furniture, leather for shoes, leather handbags, leather key chains, leather purses, leather straps, traveling cases of leather; parasols; beach umbrellas; umbrellas; harness and saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Workwear, namely, work shoes and boots, working overalls; white coats; uniforms; clothing for men, women, and children in general, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, skirts; clothing of leather, namely, leather belts, leather coats, leather jackets, leather pants, leather shoes; shirts, blouses; skirts; suits; jackets; thermal lined fleece jackets; parkas; shells; trousers; sweatpants; shorts; pullovers; sports jerseys; T-shirts; sweaters; socks; pajamas; dressing gowns; underwear; headscarves; neckties; waterproof clothing, namely, raincoats, coats, jackets, tops, bottoms, working overalls; overcoats; topcoats; swimsuits; belts; suspenders; furs, namely, fur cloaks, fur coats, fur hats, fur jackets; sportswear, namely, sports shirts, sports jerseys, sweat suits, track suits, sport suits, jackets, trousers, and coats; scarves; gloves; hats; footwear in general; sports shoes; slippers, shoes; boots and sandals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cicero Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cicero Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NO SO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |