USPTO serial 78878608
SOUNDFLAVORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUNDFLAVORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hollis Beth Hire
Hollis Beth Hire WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer hardware, namely, integrated circuits and circuit boards, computer peripherals, personal digital assistants; communications hardware and telecommunications hardware, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, radio telephones, mobile telephones, voice over internet protocol (voip) telephones, telephone answering machines, intercoms, headsets and earphones for use with telephones, pagers, telecommunications and communications switches; consumer electronic devices, namely, audio tape players, audio tape recorders, digital audio players, mp3 players, audio receivers, stereo receivers, compact disc players, video recorders, video players, video tape players, video tape recorders, digital video players, dvd players, digital video recorders, video receivers, video cameras, loudspeakers, headphones, earphones, television sets, video monitors, video recorders, radios, radios incorporating clocks, two-way radios, transceivers, megaphones; electronic devices for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content, namely, loudspeakers, sound enhancers, headphones, earphones, microphones; computer software for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content; computer software for the administration and interpretation of hearing tests, and for storing hearing test results | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | hearing aids; medical devices for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content, namely, sound enhancers, stethoscopes, assistive listening devices, headphones and earphones, microphones, loudspeakers; medical devices for testing hearing, namely, audiometers, headsets and earphones, loudspeakers, automated audiometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | testing for and development of psycho-acoustic and hearing profiles; testing for and development of psycho-acoustic and hearing profiles by means of electronic communications networks, telephone, and wireless communications media; database development services, namely, compiling and creating databases of hearing test results, hearing profiles, and psycho-acoustic profiles; customization for others of the audio output and audio characteristics of computer hardware, communications and telecommunications hardware, and consumer electronics devices for others, such services rendered in person, by wireless, wired or optical communications networks, or by encoding smart cards or optical or magnetic data storage media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sound ID
- Other trademarks owned by Sound ID
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOUNDFLAVORS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |