USPTO serial 78878983
DIGITAL EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DIGITAL EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HUBERTUS, WI, US
Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
Hubertus, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
Hubertus, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
Hubertus, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter T. Holsen
PETER T. HOLSEN Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4107UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL EDGE OF WISCONSIN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Edge Copy & Print Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named DIGITAL EDGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| May 10, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |