CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KCED

USPTO serial 78879091

KCED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KCED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott A. Edelman, Esq.

Scott A. Edelman, Esq. GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 4000LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3026UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Television broadcasting; radio broadcasting; communication services, namely radio, television, and digital television transmission services and broadcasting; online broadcasting of programs via a global computer network; online transmission of sound, video and information; simulcasting of live events, namely, simultaneous broadcasting by television, radio, and via a global computer network; providing on-line chat room discussion group services for the transmission of real-time messages among users, namely providing a real-time interactive electronic environment for educational interaction between computer users concerning topics of educational interestACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 17, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance