USPTO serial 78879783
NO PARKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO PARKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy Boldt Cohen
WENDY BOLDT COHEN BLACKWELL SANDERS PEPER MARTIN LLP720 OLIVE ST FL 24SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101-2338UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, namely, sandals, boots, sneakers, and shoes | ABANDONED | Feb 14, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2010 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |