Drawing for IHEAT

USPTO serial 78880459

IHEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IHEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harvey B. Jacobson, Jr.

HARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW FL 6WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machinery for processing extrudable polymeric material composites, containing both polymers and biopolymers, to form pellets, including underwater pelletizer and dryer, with air injection between pelletizer and dryerABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance