Drawing for TECHNOLOGY THAT DELIVERS

USPTO serial 78880553

TECHNOLOGY THAT DELIVERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHNOLOGY THAT DELIVERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl Wm. Means

KARL WM MEANS SHULMAN ROGERS GANDAL PORDY & ECKER, PA11921 ROCKVILLE PIKESTE 300ROCKVILLE, MD 20852-2743

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware devices in the nature of movement sensors, electric navigational instruments, namely, electronic navigational systems, namely, a global positioning system (GPS) providing motor vehicle location, for providing motor vehicle fleet management data reporting; computer software and hardware devices for motor vehicle theft prevention, namely, movement sensors, remote controls, used for door locking/unlocking and remote controls used for disabling or motor vehicles; electric navigational instruments, namely, electronic satellite navigational systems, namely, a global positioning system (GPS) providing driving directions and motor vehicle location; and computer software and hardware devices in the nature of movement sensors and remote vehicle operating sensors for motor vehicle speed monitoringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance