Drawing for ROBOT TAEKWON V

USPTO serial 78881140

ROBOT TAEKWON V

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBOT TAEKWON V?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ginam Lee

Ginam Lee Karacter Law Firm, APLC3600 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 1510Los Angeles, CA 90010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cinematographic and motion picture films featuring entertainment, comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation, and motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation; DVD, audio-video tapes, audio-video discs, audio-video cassettes, and digital versatile discs featuring music, comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation; CD ROM computer game discs; short motion picture film cassettes featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation to be used with hand-held viewers or projectors; computer programs, namely, software linking digitized video and audio media to a global computer information network; Game equipment sold as a unit for use with a television for playing a parlor-type computer game; video and computer game programs; and video game cartridges and cassettes; video and computer game software, electronic game programs; video and computer game cartridgesACTIVE—
028Toys and games, namely, vinyl toy figures; plastic inert toy figures; and plastic action figuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance