USPTO serial 78881744
REGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3233008Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2007
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
Sacramento, CA
Other trademarks owned by Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
Sacramento, CA
Other trademarks owned by Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
Sacramento, CA
Other trademarks owned by Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rick Oshinski
RICK OSHINSKI REGENT ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC900 UNIVERSITY AVESACRAMENTO, CA 95825-6704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction, maintenance and renovation of property | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Regent Asset Management Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named REGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |